Become a leader in the IoT community!

Join our community of embedded and IoT practitioners to contribute experience, learn new skills and collaborate with other developers with complementary skillsets.

Step 1 of 5

CREATE YOUR PROFILE *Required

OR
Step 2 of 5

WHAT BRINGS YOU TO DEVHEADS? *Choose 1 or more

Connect & collaborate 🤝with other tech professionals
Learn & Grow 📚
Contribute Experience & Expertise 🔧
Step 3 of 5

WHAT'S YOUR INTEREST OR EXPERTISE? *Choose 1 or more

Hardware Design 💡
Embedded Software 💻
Edge Networking
Step 4 of 5

Personalize your profile

Step 5 of 5

Read & agree to our COMMUNITY RULES

  1. We want this server to be a welcoming space! Treat everyone with respect. Absolutely no harassment, witch hunting, sexism, racism, or hate speech will be tolerated.
  2. If you see something against the rules or something that makes you feel unsafe, let staff know by messaging @admin in the "support-tickets" tab in the Live DevChat menu.
  3. No age-restricted, obscene or NSFW content. This includes text, images, or links featuring nudity, sex, hard violence, or other graphically disturbing content.
  4. No spam. This includes DMing fellow members.
  5. You must be over the age of 18 years old to participate in our community.
  6. You agree to our Terms of Service (https://www.devheads.io/terms-of-service/) and Privacy Policy (https://www.devheads.io/privacy-policy)
By clicking "Finish", you have read and agreed to the our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Impact of Using Extended Registers (r8, r9, etc.) on Code Size and Performance

I have a question about using the extended registers as in r8, r9, r10, …. , I want to use them frequently in my program, but I’ve noticed a problem with code size.

For instance:

mov eax, DWORD [rdi+4]

☝️This generates the following machine code: `8b 47 04` that’s 3 bytes

But when I use an extended register like `r9`, it becomes:

mov eax, DWORD [r9+4]

Which now generates : `41 8b 41 04`, which has an extra byte prolly due to the prefix `41` , making it 4 bytes now

Why does using `rN` registers ie r8, r9, etc, result in larger code size compared to using lower registers like rdi?

Apart from code size, are there other performance related concerns , it’s it’s cache performance or execution cycles or others when using the `rN` registers instead of the lower registers?

CONTRIBUTE TO THIS THREAD

Browse other Product Reviews tagged 

Leaderboard

RANKED BY XP

All time
  • 1.
    Avatar
    @Nayel115
    1620 XP
  • 2.
    Avatar
    @UcGee
    650 XP
  • 3.
    Avatar
    @melta101
    600 XP
  • 4.
    Avatar
    @chitour
    600 XP
  • 5.
    Avatar
    @lifegochi
    250 XP
  • 6.
    Avatar
    @Youuce
    180 XP